![]() Yet one of these must be the better camera, or at least certain types of shooters might reasonably prefer one or the other. But they’re close enough that it’s no way to determine which to get. Nikon has an edge in its autofocus system and (ostensibly) ISO capability, and Canon has a couple more megapixels and a slightly better LCD. Pixel peepers will want to check out the reliable and exhaustive reviews at DP Review ( here and here) and other photography-centric sites where systematic checks on image quality are conducted, but I wanted to just put these two worthy devices head to head and see not just how they compare technically but in everyday use.īefore I get into my anecdotal review, let’s just review the major specs on the two cameras. ![]() $800 buys you a lot of camera either way. ![]() For people already in the Canon or Nikon camp (full disclosure: I’m a Canon man), the choice is obvious if an upgrade is in their future, but for the less dogmatic and new recruits to the DSLR crowd, it’s not nearly as clear-cut. With HD video recording, great image quality, and a solid selection of lenses, the Nikon D5100 and Canon T3i are on the top of a lot of wish lists out there. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |